My blog three post will be in response to the starter question posted- Have you seen any feminist concepts or issues at play in the “real world” recently? What is the significance of this? Recently, I was reading the New York Times.. Yes I know what your thinking- hard to believe! Ha And I came across this article that had the title “Where having it all doesn’t mean having equality”. I quickly skimmed through the title and was shocked to what I had read! French women seem to have it all, but in reality they don’t. France ranks 46th in the 2010 gender equality report. “Eighty-two percent of French women aged 25-49 work, many of them full-time, but 82 percent of parliamentary seats are occupied by men. French women earn 26 percent less than men but spend twice as much time on domestic tasks,” stated Katrin Benholds author of the posted in the New York Times. I was outraged after reading this- having just spent several days in France this past summer I would have paid more attention to the details of femininity. It surprises me that France ranked 46th! I would love to read some standpoint theory from someone who lives in France and what they think/cope with this idea. I couldn’t help but think back to the works from Susan Hartmann, and her thoughts on Feminism. Hartmann reintroduced the idea of “womanism” and that was coined by Alice Walker and I believe that it needs to be reintroduced to France! The pictures shown are from the article as well, I thought it was necessary to show these in the post because this is a picture of a French women dropping off her kids on her way to work- in Stilettos!
Here is a link to the New Paper Article if you are interested!
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/12/world/europe/12iht-fffrance.html?_r=1&scp=7&sq=Feminism%20Still%20In%20france&st=cse
Monday, October 25, 2010
Thursday, October 21, 2010
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Post #2
After discussing the missing links that can appear in one’s biography- I began to further understand the meaning at which one might write. Following the works of other biographies it has interested me to see that some might not hold all the truths. The “missing links” or “fissures” missing I feel have an underlying reason as to why they are incorrect or not posted. After looking at some of the author’s works I can begin to understand why that can sometimes happen. They might recall an event that might not have happened in that particular way, or as we get older we may lose the “detail”. In bell hooks written biography she says this “the longer it took me to begin the process of writing autobiography, the father removed from those memories I was becoming. Each year, a memory seemed less and less clear. I wanted not to lose the vividness, the recall and felt an urgent need to begin the work and complete it.” The plot, characters, summary, and even purpose of the story can all change over time. And it is important to understand this before you begin to read an autobiography.
To answer the question as to how someone might find promise or opportunity to one’s gapingly “holey” (not in a religious way) written autobiography, is that they might find hope, meaning, guidance, and support to their own problem. Many people read autobiographies to understand that person, get their history, maybe they looked up to them, or maybe they just wanted to understand their own feelings.
Monday, October 4, 2010
Blog Post #1
After reading Pharr, “Homophobia: A weapon of Sexism”, Reagon, “Coalition Politics”, and the many other assigned to us in class, I feel that I can begin to understand the process that it took for women to finally be at today. Our first day of class we were to define what we thought a feminist was/is, and here is what we came up with, “a person (actively) pursuing equality between the sexes.” When asking myself if I still agree with that quote after all the reading that we have done- I must say that I do. A feminist I feel has to take on a certain role that many women can find difficult at times, because it wasn’t always easy to be woman. At one point a woman had no rights, “in the early 19th century women had no right to vote and limited opportunities for education. Married women had no right… to their own earnings, to hold property of their own, to divorce, except in extreme cases, or to retain custody of their children,” stated Susan M. Hartmann in her article called Feminism and Women’s Movement. See women never had such rights then that they do now, and it took a group of activist called Feminist, to set the record straight with the idea of equality. Susan Pharr thinks that the whole reason of sexism first started with economics, “forced economic dependency puts women under male control and severely limits women’s options for self-determination and self-sufficiency.” Among the many authors and works that I have read, I have come to the conclusion that I still back up my original quote/definition about what I think makes up a feminist. It is important to look at how far we have come, and how much is still needed in the future. Who knows, maybe we won’t need feminist then?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)